Down site

Webhard

Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud must be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.

Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as another cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It includes a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

Compared to the next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for a few selected sound sources. The next cloud only needs to be in a folder.

You must share a URL which means you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that can play sound sources within an environment much like MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play around 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)

It includes a large capacity. It is just a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services all together, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it's in that state, you need to find the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.

It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue being reflected in the cloud instantly. It is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to interact with other Google services such as Gmail.

If you don't upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not account for cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos could be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.



There are the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. 웹하드 순위 It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.

If you are using Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it's the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs applied to computers.Could it be obvious?)



Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It's the best in the world with regards to media reading.

There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.





The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit which might be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.

The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity is the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...

You will find a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected in real time when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself can't be documented.

There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. To be able to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely.

Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped over the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.



File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to share data conveniently with little use of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on a computer than listen to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it's much better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.